[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060922004253.2e2e2612.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:42:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-net <linux-net@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.1[78] page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x20
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:27:18 +0000 (GMT)
Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@....de> wrote:
> I get some of the "page allocation failure" errors. My hardware is 4 CPU
> Opteron with one quad + one dual intel e1000 cards. Kernel is plain 2.6.18
> and for two cards MTU is set to 9000.
>
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: vsftpd: page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x20
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel:
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: Call Trace:
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: <IRQ> [<ffffffff8024e516>] __alloc_pages+0x282/0x29b
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: [<ffffffff8807aa93>] :ip_tables:ipt_do_table+0x1eb/0x318
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: [<ffffffff8026614b>] cache_grow+0x134/0x33d
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: [<ffffffff8026664c>] cache_alloc_refill+0x189/0x1d7
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: [<ffffffff80266724>] __kmalloc+0x8a/0x94
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: [<ffffffff803b5438>] __alloc_skb+0x5c/0x123
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: [<ffffffff803b5f2e>] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x12/0x2d
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: [<ffffffff8033cb22>] e1000_alloc_rx_buffers+0x6f/0x2f3
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: [<ffffffff803d1234>] ip_local_deliver+0x173/0x23b
> Sep 21 21:03:15 athena kernel: [<ffffffff8033d29a>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x4f4/0x514
Is OK, it's just a warning and it is expected - the kernel will recover.
I'm half-inclined to shut the warning up by sticking a __GFP_NOWARN in there.
But on the other hand, that warning is handy sometimes. How come kmalloc
decided to request a 32k hunk of memory when the MTU size is only 9k? Is
the driver doing something dumb?
else if (max_frame <= E1000_RXBUFFER_8192)
adapter->rx_buffer_len = E1000_RXBUFFER_8192;
else if (max_frame <= E1000_RXBUFFER_16384)
adapter->rx_buffer_len = E1000_RXBUFFER_16384;
It sure is.
This is going to cause an 9000-byte MTU to use a 16384-byte allocation.
e1000_alloc_rx_buffers() adds two bytes to that, so we do kmalloc(16386),
which causes the slab allocator to request 32768 bytes. All for a 9kbyte skb.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists