| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20060923100603.52db1f5d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:06:03 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> Cc: tony.luck@...el.com, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, y-goto@...fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] cpu to node relationship fixup take2 [1/2] acpi_map_cpu2node On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:06:04 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:24:47 +0900 > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > I rewrote the whoe patch.. > > > > Well I don't recall ever having seen a "cpu to node relationship fixup > take1" and I have generally lost the plot regarding these fixes. > Sorry....I noticed cpu-to-node relation ship should be fixed before onlining. About subject, I should be more carefull. > What I have now is: > > cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-take2.patch > cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-map-cpu-to-node.patch > > I shall send those patches in reply to this email. Please confirm that > these are correct, sufficient, complete, etc. > will do. > Do you believe these are needed in 2.6.18.x? > yes, I do, becasue my system panics now at cpu onlining. Thank you. -Kame - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists