[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0609230435k702806e6h38578258dcfefc85@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:35:38 -0400
From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: "Matthieu CASTET" <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
On 9/23/06, Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@...e.fr> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:50:02 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> It would be nice if you could use a generic way to pass this partition data
> >> to the kernel from the mtd medium, instead of hardcoding it here.
> >
> > i often wish for such things myself :)
> >
> > unfortunately, the boot loader we utilize (u-boot) isnt exactly
> > friendly to the idea of managing flash partitions like redboot, and
> > what we have here is the current standard method for defining flash
> > partitions with mtd
>
> humm you could use cmdlinepart [1] and pass the partition as a kernel
> string with uboot.
>
> That's what we are doing and it works perfectly.
yes, that is an option ... we find that utilizing the board files "better" as:
- the boot syntax tends to be a little unwieldy
- embedded boards dont change, so if you're defining so much
board-specific information in the boards file, the partition map makes
sense there as well
- the dynamic partitioning aspect of declaring the map at runtime is
unnecessary due to the previous comment
but each to their own i guess
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists