[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060923121327.GH30245@lug-owl.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:13:27 +0200
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro-lkml@...g.org>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/03][RESUBMIT] net: EtherIP tunnel driver
On Sat, 2006-09-23 14:07:04 +0200, Joerg Roedel <joro-lkml@...g.org> wrote:
> This patchset is the resubmit of the Ethernet over IPv4 tunnel driver
> for Linux. I want to thank all reviewers for their annotations and
> helpfull input. This version contains some major changes to the driver.
> It uses an own device type now (ARPHRD_ETHERIP). This fixes the problem
> that EtherIP devices could not be safely differenced from Ethernet
> devices. This change also required some other changes. First a second
> patch to the bridge code is included to allow the use of EtherIP devices
> in a bridge. The third patch includes the necessary changes to iproute2
> (support of the new ARPHRD and general tunnel configuration support for
> EtherIP).
I haven't seen the first submission, but is this driver really needed?
Can't this be done with creating two tap interfaces on both endpoints
and bridge them with a local ethernet device using userland software?
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@...-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: Alles wird gut! ...und heute wirds schon ein bißchen besser.
the second :
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists