linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060924175934.GA15420@elte.hu>
Date:	Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:59:34 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Christian Weiske <cweiske@...iske.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-dev@...esys.com,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a

* Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:

> You have tcp_v6 lockdep warnings.  They're in
> http://xml.cweiske.de/dojo%20kernelpanic%20+%20debug.tar.bz2 is anyone is
> keen.  (I've largely lost interest in lockdep warnings - many of them are
> false positives and require make-lockdep-shut-up patches).

FYI, this is from Herbert Xu's recent mail to netdev:

| Subject: Re: neigh_lookup lockdep warning
|
| [...]
| BTW, out of the last four validator reports I've read three have 
| turned out to be genuine bugs.  So you guys have done a fantastic job!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/