[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060923.173924.78710069.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org
Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] no SA_NODEFER on sparc?
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 02:06:02 +0200
> I noticed that the sparc arch misses a definition for SA_NODEFER. Is
> that on purpose? If not, here is a patch for fixing this.
>
> Add SA_NODEFER, deprecating linuxish SA_NOMASK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
I have no problems with this patch. Userland headers already
define both SA_NODEFER and SA_NOMASK on Sparc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists