[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4516B721.5070801@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:49:37 -0700
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Exactly. So why such a "middle-ground" solution is currently
> there? I can:
> 1. mprotect() the existing mapping to PROT_EXEC and bypass the
> checks (but you can easily restrict that by patching mprotect()).
The consensus has been to add the same checks to mprotect. They were
not left out intentionally.
--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (252 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists