[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609251118.k8PBIRec000783@harpo.it.uu.se>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:18:27 +0200 (MEST)
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To: amol@...ismonetworks.com, kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc_register error return handling
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:29:00 +0530, Amol Lad wrote:
> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.18-orig/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.18-orig/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c linux-2.6.18/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
> --- linux-2.6.18-orig/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2006-09-21 10:15:25.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.18/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2006-09-25 13:59:53.000000000 +0530
> @@ -2246,6 +2246,12 @@ static int __init apm_init(void)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> + ret = misc_register(&apm_device);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "apm: cannot register misc device.\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> if (allow_ints)
> apm_info.allow_ints = 1;
> if (broken_psr)
> @@ -2282,17 +2288,20 @@ static int __init apm_init(void)
>
> if (apm_info.disabled) {
> printk(KERN_NOTICE "apm: disabled on user request.\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out_misc;
etc
NAK on the APM changes. APM can do its work just fine even if
it failed to register a device file; it will just lack some
user interface/control bits.
> @@ -2348,8 +2358,6 @@ static int __init apm_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - misc_register(&apm_device);
> -
This should just print a warning (but not fail) if misc_register()
returned failure.
/Mikael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists