| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:16:37 -0500 From: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@...thlink.net> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ppp-bugs@...samba.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Advertise PPPoE MTU / avoid memory leak. On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 18:41 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@...thlink.net> > Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:29:25 -0500 > > > I think the call path via dev->hard_start_xmit, if it fails, may result > > in an skb not being freed. This appears to be the case with the e100.c > > driver. The qdisc_restart path to dev->hard_start_xmit also appears > > susceptible to this. It appears that not all devices agree as to who > > should clean-up an skb on error. > > There is a well defined policy about who frees the SKB or has > ownership of it based upon dev->hard_start_xmit() return values. > > Any driver deviating from this set of rules should simply be > audited and fixed, as needed. > > But, no matter, your change is buggy and we can't apply your > patch (even if it does fix a leak in some legitimate case) > because it introduces an obvious double-free bug. > Yup. I'll resubmit a fixed one. -- Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@...thlink.net> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists