| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <45183E12.1080503@nachtwindheim.de> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:37:38 +0200 From: Henne <henne@...htwindheim.de> To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata-piix: kerneldoc-error-on-ata_piixc.patch 2nd try Jeff Garzik schrieb: > Randy Dunlap wrote: >> I agree with all of these except #4. Maybe you can reconcile your >> preference with that in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, which >> contains: >> >> <quote> >> The canonical patch message body contains the following: >> >> - A "from" line specifying the patch author. >> </quote> >> >> A patch submitter should not need to know the patch receiver's >> personal preferences and vary patches based on those. > > > It's not a personal preference. It's all based on git-applymbox, pretty > much. > > The SubmittingPatches doc should be updated to clarify that a From line > is not needed in the email body, if it is the same as the From line in > the RFC822 header. > > Jeff Thanks for pointing my nose on this guys! I'll keep that in mind when writing patches, but that from line should be discussed by the maintainers. Greets and thanks, Henne - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists