[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0609250757070.18552@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:59:47 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
cc: Petr Baudis <pasky@...e.cz>, David Schwartz <davids@...master.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, git@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The GPL: No shelter for the Linux kernel?
>> Would every file that does not contain an explicit license (this
>> excludes MODULE_LICENSE) falls under COPYING?
>
>[...]
>If a file doesn't have a license mentioned, it doesn't mean that it's
>"free for all" or not copyrighted, it just means that you need to find out
>what the license is some other way (and if you can't find out, you
>shouldn't be copying that file ;)
>
>Of course, for clarity, a lot of projects end up adding at least a minimal
>copyright header license everywhere, just to cover their *sses. It's not
>required, but maybe it avoids some confusion, especially if that file is
>later copied into some other project with other basic rules (but if you
>do that, you really _should_ have added the information at that point!).
>[...]
Though I strongly agree with you, some GNU folks (such as
savannah.nongnu.org) seem to explicitly require it, even for files
that do not make up a single program (i.e. like coreutils/ls.c).
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists