| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20060925081517.GB2107@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:15:17 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1 Hi! > > > And my rules are: > > > - patch must be in Linus' tree > > > - I'm asking the patch authors and maintainers of the affected subsystem > > > whether the patch is OK for 2.6.16 > > > > I thought stable rules were longer than this... including 'patch must > > be < 100 lines' and 'must be bugfix for serious bug'. Changing rules > > for -stable series in the middle of it seems like a bad idea... > > I stated what I'd do with 2.6.16 before I took over maintainance. I do not remember you stating that Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt is obsolete, and that you'll have your own version. Heh, I'm not sure greg understood that. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists