[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1159261584.24659.16.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com>
Date: 26 Sep 2006 11:06:24 +0200
From: Andrew Victor <andrew@...people.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] at91_serial: Introduction
hi,
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 04:51:45PM +0200, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > Another thing: Andrew, are you the official maintainer of this driver?
> > If not, who is?
>
> I've not heard from Andrew, so I'm not sure what to do about this. I
> think these changes need validating by someone with the existing driver's
> hardware (iow, AT91RM9200 and/or AT91SAM9261) so we can be sure we don't
> break that support.
For patch 1, I'm not to keen on the:
+#ifdef CONFIG_AVR32
+ port->flags |= UPF_IOREMAP;
+ port->membase = ioremap(pdev->resource[0].start,
+ pdev->resource[0].end
+ - pdev->resource[0].start + 1);
+#else
part. It might be better to pass a flag (in the platform_data
structure) whether we are providing a virtual or a physical address.
(If you want early init on the serial console, then I recommend just
using a static mapping for the DBGU peripheral).
Patch 2 & 3 look correct, but they would need to be tested.
Regards,
Andrew Victor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists