linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.18-mm1 compile failure on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:04:51 +0100
From:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC:	Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...source.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-mm1 compile failure on x86_64

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 September 2006 11:58, Andre Noll wrote:
>> On 19:35, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> I have seen this one as well,
>> Me too. Current linus git tree, x86_64 SMP, gcc-3.3.5, GNU ld version 2.15, binutils
>> 2.15-6, Debian.
> 
> We can probably revert the notes patch for now, since it is only needed
> for Xen which isn't even merged yet.
> 
> Ian, do you think you can do the notes in some different way that still
> works with old binutils?
> 
> -Andi

In my testing, backing out the old patch and putting the one mentioned
in the following message seems to work:

http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2006-08/msg01416.html

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/