[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609271444.k8REiDLE005062@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:44:13 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: vgoyal@...ibm.com
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, fastboot@...ts.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] Stupid kexec/kdump question...
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:24:20 EDT, Vivek Goyal said:
> Currently we are reserving 64MB of memory for our testing purposes on
> i386 and x86_64. Any thing lesser than that, sometimes either system
> hangs or OOM killer pitches in. Now people are working on preparing custom
> initrd for dumping purposes so that dumping can be done from early user
> space itself. This might lead to reduced memory usage and more reliability.
> I think soon it should be available in fedora (busybox based custom initrd
> for crashdumping purposes.)
I'm told the busybox-based initrd stuff has been pushed to Fedora Rawhide, but
it hasn't emerged yet - so most likely within the next 24 hours or so. I'll
report back what happens... :)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists