[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m11wpxm4sy.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:29:33 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Message signaled irq handling cleanups
ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> The following patch set should be enough to clear up the
> outstanding issues with genirq on i386 and x86_64. This actually
> takes things a step farther and moves all of architecture
> dependencies I could find into the appropriate architecture.
>
> So hopefully we are finally close enough that other architectures
> will be able implement msi support, without too much trouble.
>
> msi: Simplify msi sanity checks by adding with generic irq code.
> msi: Only use a single irq_chip for msi interrupts
> msi: Refactor and move the msi irq_chip into the arch code.
> msi: Move the ia64 code into arch/ia64
> htirq: Tidy up the htirq code
>
> Eric
Grr.. My ia64 compiler is way too slow. It just told me I had some
trivial bugs in the altix portion of what I posted. Sorry I forgot
to mention all I can do is compile test ia64.
So here comes a second time with code that actually compiles :)
Darn this code that is so ugly that you have to test the cleanup on
multiple architectures!
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists