[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609272257.02385.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:57:02 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
Cc: luke Yang <luke.adi@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
Am Wednesday 27 September 2006 19:19 schrieb Robin Getz:
> OK - I was just doing the similar thing to what already exists in
> ./asm-blackfin/system.h
>
> #define local_irq_enable() do { \
> __asm__ __volatile__ ( \
> "sti %0;" \
> ::"d"(irq_flags)); \
> } while (0)
>
> which could be simplified to:
>
> #define local_irq_enable() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sti %0;" ::"d"(irq_flags));
Actually, this one is slightly broken, because of the ';' at the end of the
macro (think of "if(x) local_irq_enable(); else somthing_else()").
What I was suggesting is to make a proper inline function, like
static inline void local_irq_enable(void)
{
unsigned long unused_flags;
asm volatile ("sti %0;" : : "d" (unused_flags));
}
That completely avoids all the problems you might hit with macro expansion,
while still compiling to the same code.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists