[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609220643.07750.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:43:07 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: [patch 2.6.18] genirq: remove oops with fasteoi irq_chip descriptors
The irq handler code can oops when used with an irq_chip with just
enable/disable/eoi methods, appropriate for handle_fasteoi_irq(),
either by (a) uninstalling, or (b) using it with a chained handler.
The problem was that the original code expected there would always
be mask/unmask/ack methods, and the fix is to instead use methods
which are always present and which more closely correspond to the
flag manipulation being done.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>
--- d26.rc4test.orig/kernel/irq/chip.c 2006-09-21 16:41:11.000000000 -0700
+++ d26.rc4test/kernel/irq/chip.c 2006-09-21 18:04:07.000000000 -0700
@@ -482,10 +482,8 @@ __set_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
/* Uninstall? */
if (handle == handle_bad_irq) {
- if (desc->chip != &no_irq_chip) {
- desc->chip->mask(irq);
- desc->chip->ack(irq);
- }
+ if (desc->chip != &no_irq_chip)
+ desc->chip->shutdown(irq);
desc->status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
desc->depth = 1;
}
@@ -495,7 +493,7 @@ __set_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
desc->status &= ~IRQ_DISABLED;
desc->status |= IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE;
desc->depth = 0;
- desc->chip->unmask(irq);
+ desc->chip->startup(irq);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists