linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc1] ehea firmware interface based on Anton Blanchard's new hvcall interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <451AF29D.2030102@garzik.org>
Date:	Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:52:29 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@...ibm.com>
CC:	pmac@....ibm.com, Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
	Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
	Marcus Eder <meder@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Klein <tklein@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc1] ehea firmware interface based on Anton Blanchard's
 new hvcall interface

Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> Hi Jeff, 
> 
> the last patch did not work, so here is the new patch. The patch is build against
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev.2.6.git HEAD today.
> Could you give it a try?

Per the standard patch format in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, these 
sort of comments should go beneath the "---" separator.  Otherwise, if 
they are not hand-edited out, they will go into the final changeset 
description.


> This eHEA patch reflects changes according to Anton's new hvcall interface
> which has been commited in Paul's git tree:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc.git

When is this going upstream?  I don't want things to get too out-of-sync.


> In addition to the above changes the patch includes a bug fix (port state
> notification) and minor changes (default queue length, coding style updates).

These changes should be in a separate patch.  Makes 'git bisect' work 
better, makes the changes more reviewable, and in general follows the 
"separate logical changes" rule.


> diff -Nurp netdev-2.6/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_ethtool.c netdev-2.6_patched/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_ethtool.c
> --- netdev-2.6/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_ethtool.c	2006-09-26 10:27:38.000000000 +0200
> +++ netdev-2.6_patched/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_ethtool.c	2006-09-26 19:28:22.000000000 +0200
> @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static void ehea_get_ethtool_stats(struc
>  	kfree(cb6);
>  }
>  
> -const struct ethtool_ops ehea_ethtool_ops = {
> +struct ethtool_ops ehea_ethtool_ops = {
>  	.get_settings = ehea_get_settings,
>  	.get_drvinfo = ehea_get_drvinfo,
>  	.get_msglevel = ehea_get_msglevel,


This is an obvious regression.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/