linux-kernel - Re: GPLv3 Position Statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0609270753590.19275@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:55:41 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Sergey Panov <sipan@...an.org>
cc:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement


>Fuzzy (but realistic) logic:
>
>   kernel != operating_system
>
>   operating_system > kernel
>
>   operating_system - kernel = 0
>
>   kernel - (operating_system - kernel) < 0
>
>Another (license compatibility) Q. is:
>    If the (operating_system - kernel) is re-licensed under v.3 and
>    the kernel is still under v.2 , would it be possible to distribute
>    combination (kernel + (operating_system - kernel)) ?

If by operating system you mean the surrounding userland application, 
then yes, why should there be a problem with a GPL2 kernel and a GPL3 
userland? After all, the userland is not only GPL, but also BSD and 
other stuff.

>The last Q. is how good is the almost forgotten Hurd kernel?

Wild guess: At most on par with Minix.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/