[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609270944.35110.eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:44:34 +0200
From: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86/x86-64 merge for 2.6.19
Am Dienstag, 26. September 2006 23:43 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > out of curiosity, wouldn't be better to sync with Andrew via git?
> > Why via plain patches?
> >
> > What am I missing?
>
> I think you're just missing that we've become so used to it that it's just
> easier than all the alternatives.
[...]
> I think it's worked out pretty well, no?
Nearly everyone else seems to remove the '[PATCH]' from the subject line when
putting things into git. Everything I suspect coming from Andrew to your tree
still has it. Is this intentional or just yet another skript needing a
fix? :)
Eike
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists