[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060928002610.05e61321.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:26:10 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Put the BUG __FILE__ and __LINE__ info out of line
On 28 Sep 2006 09:17:31 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@....de> wrote:
> > Plan #17 is to just put the BUG inline and then put the EIP+file*+line into
> > a separate section, then search that section at BUG time to find the record
> > whose EIP points back at this ud2a.
> >
> > It's a bit messy for modules, but it minimises the .text impact and keeps
> > disassembly happy, no?
> >
> > And if done right it can probably be used by other architectures.
>
>
> The way x86-64 solved it was to turn the inline code into valid
> instructions. This can be done with two additional bytes.
> IMHO that's the right solution for the problem on i386 too
>
That uses even more text.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists