linux-kernel - [PATCH] bonding: lockdep annotation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1159436561.28131.37.camel@taijtu>
Date:	Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:42:41 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Chad Tindel <ctindel@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bonding: lockdep annotation


=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.17-1.2600.fc6 #1
---------------------------------------------
ifconfig/2411 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&dev->_xmit_lock){-...}, at: [<ffffffff80429b9f>] dev_mc_add+0x45/0x15f

but task is already holding lock:
 (&dev->_xmit_lock){-...}, at: [<ffffffff80429b9f>] dev_mc_add+0x45/0x15f

other info that might help us debug this:
3 locks held by ifconfig/2411:
 #0:  (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802664af>] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e
 #1:  (&dev->_xmit_lock){-...}, at: [<ffffffff80429b9f>] dev_mc_add+0x45/0x15f
 #2:  (&bond->lock){-.-+}, at: [<ffffffff8831b7f7>] bond_set_multicast_list+0x2c/0x26a [bonding]

stack backtrace:

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8026e97d>] show_trace+0xae/0x319
 [<ffffffff8026ebfd>] dump_stack+0x15/0x17
 [<ffffffff802a839b>] __lock_acquire+0x135/0xa64
 [<ffffffff802a926d>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x69
 [<ffffffff80267981>] _spin_lock_bh+0x2a/0x36
 [<ffffffff80429b9f>] dev_mc_add+0x45/0x15f
 [<ffffffff8831b903>] :bonding:bond_set_multicast_list+0x138/0x26a
 [<ffffffff80429901>] __dev_mc_upload+0x22/0x24
 [<ffffffff80429c74>] dev_mc_add+0x11a/0x15f
 [<ffffffff8045d154>] igmp_group_added+0x55/0x10f
 [<ffffffff8045d4ab>] ip_mc_inc_group+0x1d6/0x21a
 [<ffffffff8045d535>] ip_mc_up+0x46/0x61
 [<ffffffff804594b8>] inetdev_init+0x11c/0x136
 [<ffffffff8045a0b7>] devinet_ioctl+0x3eb/0x5e9
 [<ffffffff8045a56c>] inet_ioctl+0x71/0x8f
 [<ffffffff8041ed74>] sock_ioctl+0x1e8/0x20a
 [<ffffffff80243ae0>] do_ioctl+0x2a/0x77
 [<ffffffff802325cc>] vfs_ioctl+0x25a/0x277
 [<ffffffff8024ea4b>] sys_ioctl+0x5f/0x82
 [<ffffffff8026060e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83

The bonding driver nests other drivers, give the bonding driver its own
lock class.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 0fb5f65..ebbf002 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -4692,6 +4692,8 @@ static int bond_check_params(struct bond
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static struct lock_class_key bonding_netdev_xmit_lock_key;
+
 /* Create a new bond based on the specified name and bonding parameters.
  * Caller must NOT hold rtnl_lock; we need to release it here before we
  * set up our sysfs entries.
@@ -4727,6 +4729,9 @@ int bond_create(char *name, struct bond_
 	if (res < 0) {
 		goto out_bond;
 	}
+
+	lockdep_set_class(&bond_dev->_xmit_lock, &bonding_netdev_xmit_lock_key);
+
 	if (newbond)
 		*newbond = bond_dev->priv;
 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/