linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] device_for_each_child(): kill pointless warning noise

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1159443030.11049.409.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:30:30 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] device_for_each_child(): kill pointless warning noise

Ar Mer, 2006-09-27 am 21:50 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jeff Garzik:
> "almost all"  Thus it is wrong to _force_ the usage model on the caller.
> 
> It should be obvious that a simple search need not _require_ a dummy 
> return value, that is promptly ignored.

How about just adding an explicit device_for_each_child_noret() or
similar function so that the safety check stays as well for the usual
case.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/