[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1159462990.5015.50.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:03:10 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Tiny error in printk output for clocksource : a3:<6>Time:
acpi_pm clocksource has been installed.
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 18:19 +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> You are trying to cover all possible cases with this monstrosity:
> extern char *__dev_addr6_fmt(char* buf, const unsigned char *addr);
> #define DEV_ADDR6_FMT "%s" /* expands to: "FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF" */
> #define DEV_ADDR6_BUF char __dev_addr6_buf[sizeof("FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF")]
> DEV_ADDR6_BUF;
> ...
> printk(", h/w address " DEV_ADDR6_FMT "\n", DEV_ADDR6(dev->dev_addr));
Yup, it's not pretty.
> Why don't you use a parameter for DEV_ADDR6{_BUF}? DEV_ADDR6_BUF(var_name).
> DEV_ADDR6(var_name, addr). That would be less cryptic.
Your idea makes code a bit visually longer, but I've no real objection.
> print_mac(", h/w address ", dev->dev_addr, "\n");
> > Would a patch with a DEV6_ADDR->EUI48 substitution
> > be acceptable?
>
> Maybe. Doesn't look obvious, but if it is in standards...
Perhaps:
extern char *__EUI48_fmt(char *buf, const unsigned char *addr);
#define EUI48_FMT "%s" /* expands to: "FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF" */
#define DECLARE_EUI48(name) char name[sizeof("FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF")]
#define EUI48(name, addr) __EUI48_fmt(name, (const unsigned char *)addr)
use case:
{
DECLARE_EUI48(eui48);
printk("mac: " EUI48_FMT, EUI48(eui48, dev->dev_addr));
}
Here's one with an assumption of an eui48 buffer name.
extern char *__EUI48_fmt(char *buf, const unsigned char *addr);
#define EUI48_FMT "%s" /* expands to: "FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF" */
#define DECLARE_EUI48 char __eui48_buf[sizeof("FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF")]
#define EUI48(addr) __EUI48_fmt(__eui48_buf, (const unsigned char *)addr)
use case:
{
DECLARE_EUI48;
printk("mac: " EUI48_FMT, EUI48(dev->dev_addr));
}
Which one do you like more?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists