[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060928172803.GC8746@in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:58:03 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, sekharan@...ibm.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, nagar@...son.ibm.com,
matthltc@...ibm.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: [RFC, PATCH 2/9] CPU Controller V2 - Task-group priority handling
To retain good interactivity, priority of a task-group is defined to be the
same as the priority of the highest-priority runnable task it has in its
runqueue.
This means as tasks come and go, priority of a task-group can change.
This patch deals with such changes to task-group priority.
P.S : Is this a good idea? Don't know. Other option is to to have a static
task-group priority which is decided by its quota.
Signed-off-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
---
linux-2.6.18-root/kernel/sched.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/sched.c~update_task_grp_prio kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.6.18/kernel/sched.c~update_task_grp_prio 2006-09-28 16:39:15.840754048 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.18-root/kernel/sched.c 2006-09-28 17:23:21.191599592 +0530
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static inline unsigned int task_timeslic
struct prio_array {
unsigned int nr_active;
- int best_static_prio;
+ int best_static_prio, best_dyn_prio;
DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, MAX_PRIO+1); /* include 1 bit for delimiter */
struct list_head queue[MAX_PRIO];
};
@@ -710,6 +710,55 @@ sched_info_switch(struct task_struct *pr
#define sched_info_switch(t, next) do { } while (0)
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS || CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT */
+/* Dequeue task-group object from the main per-cpu runqueue */
+static void dequeue_task_grp(struct task_grp_rq *tgrq)
+{
+ struct prio_array *array = tgrq->rq_array;
+
+ array->nr_active--;
+ list_del(&tgrq->list);
+ if (list_empty(array->queue + tgrq->prio))
+ __clear_bit(tgrq->prio, array->bitmap);
+ tgrq->rq_array = NULL;
+}
+
+/* Enqueue task-group object on the main per-cpu runqueue */
+static void enqueue_task_grp(struct task_grp_rq *tgrq, struct prio_array *array,
+ int head)
+{
+ if (!head)
+ list_add_tail(&tgrq->list, array->queue + tgrq->prio);
+ else
+ list_add(&tgrq->list, array->queue + tgrq->prio);
+ __set_bit(tgrq->prio, array->bitmap);
+ array->nr_active++;
+ tgrq->rq_array = array;
+}
+
+/* Priority of a task-group is defined to be the priority of the highest
+ * priority runnable task it has. As tasks belonging to a task-group come in
+ * and go, the task-group priority can change on a particular CPU.
+ */
+static inline void update_task_grp_prio(struct task_grp_rq *tgrq, struct rq *rq,
+ int head)
+{
+ int new_prio;
+ struct prio_array *array = tgrq->rq_array;
+
+ new_prio = tgrq->active->best_dyn_prio;
+ if (new_prio == MAX_PRIO)
+ new_prio = tgrq->expired->best_dyn_prio;
+
+ if (array)
+ dequeue_task_grp(tgrq);
+ tgrq->prio = new_prio;
+ if (new_prio != MAX_PRIO) {
+ if (!array)
+ array = rq->active;
+ enqueue_task_grp(tgrq, array, head);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Adding/removing a task to/from a priority array:
*/
@@ -717,8 +766,17 @@ static void dequeue_task(struct task_str
{
array->nr_active--;
list_del(&p->run_list);
- if (list_empty(array->queue + p->prio))
+ if (list_empty(array->queue + p->prio)) {
__clear_bit(p->prio, array->bitmap);
+ if (p->prio == array->best_dyn_prio) {
+ struct task_grp_rq *tgrq = task_grp_rq(p);
+
+ array->best_dyn_prio =
+ sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
+ if (array == tgrq->active || !tgrq->active->nr_active)
+ update_task_grp_prio(tgrq, task_rq(p), 0);
+ }
+ }
}
static void enqueue_task(struct task_struct *p, struct prio_array *array)
@@ -728,6 +786,14 @@ static void enqueue_task(struct task_str
__set_bit(p->prio, array->bitmap);
array->nr_active++;
p->array = array;
+
+ if (p->prio < array->best_dyn_prio) {
+ struct task_grp_rq *tgrq = task_grp_rq(p);
+
+ array->best_dyn_prio = p->prio;
+ if (array == tgrq->active || !tgrq->active->nr_active)
+ update_task_grp_prio(tgrq, task_rq(p), 0);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -746,6 +812,14 @@ enqueue_task_head(struct task_struct *p,
__set_bit(p->prio, array->bitmap);
array->nr_active++;
p->array = array;
+
+ if (p->prio < array->best_dyn_prio) {
+ struct task_grp_rq *tgrq = task_grp_rq(p);
+
+ array->best_dyn_prio = p->prio;
+ if (array == tgrq->active || !tgrq->active->nr_active)
+ update_task_grp_prio(tgrq, task_rq(p), 1);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -6831,7 +6905,9 @@ static void task_grp_rq_init(struct task
tgrq->expired = tgrq->arrays + 1;
tgrq->rq_array = NULL;
tgrq->expired->best_static_prio = MAX_PRIO;
+ tgrq->expired->best_dyn_prio = MAX_PRIO;
tgrq->active->best_static_prio = MAX_PRIO;
+ tgrq->active->best_dyn_prio = MAX_PRIO;
tgrq->prio = MAX_PRIO;
tgrq->tg = tg;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tgrq->list);
_
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists