linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86[-64] PCI domain support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:31:16 +0300
From:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Jim Paradis <jparadis@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jdmason@...zu.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86[-64] PCI domain support

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:03:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> hmmmm.  What kernels did you test?

mainline as of today + several unrelated Calgary patches I'll post
shortly + your PCI domains patch + my Calgary patch. I'll test with
iommu=off next.

> That should narrow down the problems.  A problem with aic94xx sorta 
> sounds like something unrelated.

Not necessarily - Calgary is an isolating IOMMU, meaning that if we
set up a mapping for aic94xx in the wrong IO space due to a Calgary
bug, aic94xx will fall over and die. Usually however this happens a
lot sooner. Also, we have code in Calgary to detect when an errant DMA
happens and it hasn't triggered in this case.

Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/