[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <451B5587.2050601@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:54:31 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Illustration of warning explosion silliness
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:36:28 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
>
>> device_for_each_child()
>
> All that being said, device_for_each_child() is rather broken by design.
> It walks a list of items applying a function to them and bales out on
> first-error.
Or, like scsi_sysfs.c, it stops when it meets the first match. Which is
a common thing to do.
> There's no way in which the caller can know which items have been operated
> on, nor which items have yet to be operated on, nor which item experienced
> the failure. Any caller which is serious about error recovery presumably
> won't use it, unless the callback function happens to be something which
> makes no state changes.
A simple integer return error doesn't tell you all that information
either. The actor must obviously store that additional information
somewhere, if it cares.
But whatever. I give up. I'm going back to working on the libata
warnings each build spits out (iomap).
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists