linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] Generic BUG handling.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:10:19 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
Cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickens <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] Generic BUG handling.

On 29 Sep 2006 10:57:45 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@....de> wrote:

> > Some architectures (powerpc) implement WARN using the same mechanism;
> > if the illegal instruction was the result of a WARN, then report_bug()
> > returns 1; otherwise it returns 0.
> 
> In theory we could do that on x86 too (and skipping the instruction), 
> the only problem 
> is that the only guaranteed to fault opcode is ud2 :/. Ok maybe we could
> reserve some int XXX vector.
> 
> % gid WARN_ON | grep -v arch | wc -l
> 299

powerpc sets a bit in the __LINE__ number to indicate that it was a
WARN_ON.  That'll work on all architectures.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/