| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: 29 Sep 2006 12:08:22 +0200 From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@...1149.net> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement >>>>> "Tridge" == tridge <tridge@...ba.org> writes: Tridge> I'm also a strong proponent of "authors rights", and I would Tridge> consider it very nasty if someone took one of my projects and Tridge> decided to fork it to be GPLv2 only, deliberately going Tridge> against my intention. They might have a legal right to do so Tridge> but it would clearly be against my wishes. I'm not even 100% Tridge> certain it would be legal. Tridge> The "any later version" words I have put on all my projects Tridge> are there quite deliberately. Tridge: *you* also chose deliberately to use the GPL which explicitely allows other people to do so. You could have written "the latest version of the GPL as released by the FSF" or used a licence similar to the GPLv2 with the permission to restrain the licence removed. Moreover, anyone can add a patch released under the GPLv2 only (this is their right, morally and technically) to a copy of your software; after that, they have no choice but to redistribute the whole as GPLv2 only (I insist on "the whole", of course they might keep the "or later" on your individual files). Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@...1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists