[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060929124249.GA4931@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:42:50 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Sergey Panov <sipan@...an.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
Hi!
> > The reason a clause such as that will work is that people have no natural
> > right to redistribute Linux.
>
> Right. Any copyright license will basically say
>
> "You can distribute this assuming you do so-and-so"
>
> and a contract can actually extend on that and also limit you in other
> ways than just distribution, ie you can sat
>
> "You can buy this, but you cannot legally benchmark it"
>
> However, none of that actually extends your "derived work" in any way.
You are right, of course, but you can affect derived work by stuff
such as:
You may not copy Linux. As a special exception, you may
copy/distribute
Linux if you never copied Tolstoy before.
That would probably work.... in cases like Tivo anyway.
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists