[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609291519.k8TFJfvw004256@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:19:41 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-mm2 - oops in cache_alloc_refill()
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:29:31 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> bisecting would be good, thanks. It might be quicker to strip down the .config
> though.
Well, I started with a clean 2.6.18 tree, and did a 'quilt push origin.patch'
to put just the stuff already in Linus's tree on. Unfortunately, *that*
dies a *different* horrid death after 2 to 5 minutes or so of uptime (and
this one is also a locked-up-hard power-cycle hang, no alt-sysrq). Of the
3 or 4 times I triggered it, it managed to scribble the oops down into
syslog before totally wedging:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00100104
printing eip:
c014c8b3
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0002 [#1]
PREEMPT
Modules linked in: xt_SECMARK xt_CONNSECMARK ip6table_mangle iptable_mangle nf_conntrack_ftp xt_pkttype ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 ipt_LOG iptable_filter ip_tables xt_tcpudp nf_conntrack_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6t_LOG xt_limit ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables thermal processor fan button battery ac nfnetlink i8k floppy nvram orinoco_cs orinoco hermes pcmcia firmware_class ohci1394 intel_agp ieee1394 agpgart yenta_socket rsrc_nonstatic pcmcia_core rtc
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<c014c8b3>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010083 (2.6.18-test #1)
EIP is at drain_freelist+0x45/0x9b
eax: 00200200 ebx: e5ce0540 ecx: effe10c0 edx: 00100100
esi: effdf4c0 edi: 00000001 ebp: effd2f54 esp: effd2f40
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process events/0 (pid: 3, ti=effd2000 task=c56cf000 task.ti=effd2000)
Stack: 00000002 effe18c0 effdf4c0 effe18c0 efe006c0 effd2f64 c014d8ea 00000296
c053df60 effd2f80 c0120f91 c014d864 00000000 efe006d0 efe006c0 efe006c8
effd2fc4 c01214d6 00000001 00000000 00000001 00010000 00000000 00000000
Call Trace:
[<c014d8ea>] cache_reap+0x86/0xc4
[<c0120f91>] run_workqueue+0x8f/0xe0
[<c01214d6>] worker_thread+0xe1/0x113
[<c0123861>] kthread+0xb0/0xdf
[<c0103813>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
DWARF2 unwinder stuck at kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
Leftover inexact backtrace:
[<c0103c4d>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x12/0x25
[<c0103cec>] show_stack_log_lvl+0x8c/0x97
[<c0103e18>] show_registers+0x121/0x1b2
[<c0104041>] die+0x198/0x273
[<c034fce1>] do_page_fault+0x3f5/0x4c2
[<c034e819>] error_code+0x39/0x40
[<c014d8ea>] cache_reap+0x86/0xc4
[<c0120f91>] run_workqueue+0x8f/0xe0
[<c01214d6>] worker_thread+0xe1/0x113
[<c0123861>] kthread+0xb0/0xdf
[<c0103813>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
=======================
Code: f0 ff ff ff 40 14 8b 5e 14 39 d3 75 19 fb 89 e0 25 00 f0 ff ff ff 48 14 8b 40 08 a8 08 74 59 e8 99 04 20 00 eb 52 8b 13 8b 43 04 <89> 42 04 89 10 c7 03 00 01 10 00 c7 43 04 00 02 20 00 8b 46 18
EIP: [<c014c8b3>] drain_freelist+0x45/0x9b SS:ESP 0068:effd2f40
<6>note: events/0[3] exited with preempt_count 1
Now the question arises - is this the same bug I was seeing under the full -mm2,
and all the other patches just move the manifestation around, or is this fixed
by another -mm2 patch, and my original bug report is something else?
I may have to learn how to use 'git bisect' to shoot this one, it appears.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists