linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] Generic BUG handling.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:44:37 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	michael@...erman.id.au
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, Hugh Dickens <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] Generic BUG handling.

Michael Ellerman wrote:
> It needed a bit of work to get going on powerpc:
>
> Generic BUG handling, Powerpc fixups
>   

BTW, powerpc doesn't seem to be using BUG_OPCODE or 
BUG_ILLEGAL_INSTRUCTION for actual BUGs any more (I presume they were 
once used).  There are still a couple of uses of those macros elsewhere 
(kernel/prom_init.c and kernel/head_64.S); should be converted to "twi 
31,0,0" as well?

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/