linux-kernel - Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060929131350.ef1bd156.pj@sgi.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:13:50 -0700
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc:	sekharan@...ibm.com, jtk@...ibm.com, jes@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, lse-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	sgrubb@...hat.com, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark

Matt wrote:
> Heh, sorry about that. I do have some initial kernbench numbers.

Thanks.  You mention that one of the patches, Benchmark, reduced
time spent in user space.  I guess that means that patch hurt
something ... though I'm confused ... wouldn't these patches risk
spending more time in system space, not less in user space?

Do you have any analysis of the other runs?  Just looking at raw
numbers, when it's not a benchmark I've used recently, kinda fuzzes
over my feeble brain.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/