linux-kernel - Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060929133205.19c318cb.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date:	Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:32:05 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>
Cc:	Roger Gammans <roger@...puter-surgery.co.uk>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?

On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:22:34 -0700 Zach Brown wrote:

> 
> > 	sector_t		bi_sector;	/* block layer sector
> > 						 * addresses are always in
> > 						 * 512-byte units in Linux */
> 
> How about adding kerneldoc for sector_t itself?

Good idea, but afaik it would have to be added for the entire
struct, not just one field.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/