linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060928194142.cece62bb.pj@sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:41:42 -0700
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jes@....com,
	lse-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, sekharan@...ibm.com,
	jtk@...ibm.com, hch@....de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	sgrubb@...hat.com, linux-audit@...hat.com, menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction

How might this play with Paul Menage's <menage@...gle.com> patch posted
earlier today on lkml:

  [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Generic container system

My cpuset_exit() call is getting popular - both you guys seem to have
designs on it.

Separate question - I guess that your task watcher mechanism, the
way it uses linker magic now, would not enable a loadable module
to plug into these various fork/exit/... hooks.  Is that right?

Such an ability for loadable modules to get callouts on fork/exit
would be useful to some ... it could also be a controversial ability.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/