[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060930014356.aa22dd48.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:43:56 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jim Gettys <jg@...top.org>, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 15/23] high-res timers: core
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:58:34 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> add the core bits of high-res timers support.
>
> the design makes use of the existing hrtimers subsystem which manages a
> per-CPU and per-clock tree of timers, and the clockevents framework, which
> provides a standard API to request programmable clock events from. The
> core code does not have to know about the clock details - it makes use
> of clockevents_set_next_event().
>
> the code also provides dyntick functionality: it is implemented via a
> per-cpu sched_tick hrtimer that is set to HZ frequency, but which is
> reprogrammed to a longer timeout before going idle, and reprogrammed to
> HZ again once the CPU goes busy again. (If an non-timer IRQ hits the
> idle task then it will process jiffies before calling the IRQ code.)
>
> the impact to non-high-res architectures is intended to be minimal.
>
> ...
>
> @@ -108,17 +134,53 @@ struct hrtimer_cpu_base {
> spinlock_t lock;
> struct lock_class_key lock_key;
> struct hrtimer_clock_base clock_base[HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES];
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
> + ktime_t expires_next;
> + int hres_active;
> + unsigned long check_clocks;
> + struct list_head cb_pending;
> + struct hrtimer sched_timer;
> + struct pt_regs *sched_regs;
> + unsigned long events;
> +#endif
You forgot to update the kerneldoc for this struct.
Does `events' needs to be long?
<looks>
oh, it's a scalar this time ;)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
> +
> +extern void hrtimer_clock_notify(void);
> +extern void clock_was_set(void);
> +extern void hrtimer_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
> +# define hrtimer_cb_get_time(t) (t)->base->get_time()
> +# define hrtimer_hres_active (__get_cpu_var(hrtimer_bases).hres_active)
These two could be inline functions?
That might cause include file ordering problems I guess.
> +/*
> + * The resolution of the clocks. The resolution value is returned in
> + * the clock_getres() system call to give application programmers an
> + * idea of the (in)accuracy of timers. Timer values are rounded up to
> + * this resolution values.
> + */
> +# define KTIME_HIGH_RES (ktime_t) { .tv64 = CONFIG_HIGH_RES_RESOLUTION }
> +# define KTIME_MONOTONIC_RES KTIME_HIGH_RES
> +
> +#else
> +
> +# define KTIME_MONOTONIC_RES KTIME_LOW_RES
> +
> /*
> * clock_was_set() is a NOP for non- high-resolution systems. The
> * time-sorted order guarantees that a timer does not expire early and
> * is expired in the next softirq when the clock was advanced.
> */
> -#define clock_was_set() do { } while (0)
> -#define hrtimer_clock_notify() do { } while (0)
> -extern ktime_t ktime_get(void);
> -extern ktime_t ktime_get_real(void);
> +# define clock_was_set() do { } while (0)
> +# define hrtimer_clock_notify() do { } while (0)
these could be inlines.
> +# define hrtimer_cb_get_time(t) (t)->base->softirq_time
Does this need parenthesisation? Probably it's OK.. An inline function
would be nicer.
> +# define hrtimer_hres_active 0
Perhaps this would be better if it was presented as a function.
> +/* High resolution timer related functions */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
> +
> +static ktime_t last_jiffies_update;
What's this do?
> +/*
> + * Reprogramm the event source with checking both queues for the
"Reprogramme" ;)
> + * next event
> + * Called with interrupts disabled and base->lock held
> + */
> +static void hrtimer_force_reprogram(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct hrtimer_clock_base *base = cpu_base->clock_base;
> + ktime_t expires;
> +
> + cpu_base->expires_next.tv64 = KTIME_MAX;
> +
> + for (i = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES; i ; i--, base++) {
Downcounting loops hurt my brain. Does it actually generate better code?
> + struct hrtimer *timer;
> +
> + if (!base->first)
> + continue;
> + timer = rb_entry(base->first, struct hrtimer, node);
> + expires = ktime_sub(timer->expires, base->offset);
> + if (expires.tv64 < cpu_base->expires_next.tv64)
> + cpu_base->expires_next = expires;
> + }
> +
> + if (cpu_base->expires_next.tv64 != KTIME_MAX)
> + clockevents_set_next_event(cpu_base->expires_next, 1);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Shared reprogramming for clock_realtime and clock_monotonic
> + *
> + * When a new expires first timer is enqueued, we have
That sentence might need work.
> +/*
> + * Retrigger next event is called after clock was set
> + */
> +static void retrigger_next_event(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base;
> + struct timespec realtime_offset;
> + unsigned long flags, seq;
> +
> + do {
> + seq = read_seqbegin(&xtime_lock);
> + set_normalized_timespec(&realtime_offset,
> + -wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec,
> + -wall_to_monotonic.tv_nsec);
> + } while (read_seqretry(&xtime_lock, seq));
> +
> + base = &per_cpu(hrtimer_bases, smp_processor_id());
> +
> + /* Adjust CLOCK_REALTIME offset */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock, flags);
> + base->clock_base[CLOCK_REALTIME].offset =
> + timespec_to_ktime(realtime_offset);
> +
> + hrtimer_force_reprogram(base);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Clock realtime was set
> + *
> + * Change the offset of the realtime clock vs. the monotonic
> + * clock.
> + *
> + * We might have to reprogram the high resolution timer interrupt. On
> + * SMP we call the architecture specific code to retrigger _all_ high
> + * resolution timer interrupts. On UP we just disable interrupts and
> + * call the high resolution interrupt code.
> + */
> +void clock_was_set(void)
> +{
> + preempt_disable();
> + if (hrtimer_hres_active) {
> + retrigger_next_event(NULL);
> +
> + if (smp_call_function(retrigger_next_event, NULL, 1, 1))
> + BUG();
> + }
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
If you use on_each_cpu() here you know that retrigger_next_event() will be
called under local_irq_disable(). The preempt_disable() goes away and the
spin_lock_irqsave() in retrigger_next_event() becomes a spin_lock() and
everything becomes simpler.
> +/**
> + * hrtimer_clock_notify - A clock source or a clock event has been installed
> + *
> + * Notify the per cpu softirqs to recheck the clock sources and events
> + */
> +void hrtimer_clock_notify(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
> + set_bit(0, &per_cpu(hrtimer_bases, i).check_clocks);
> +}
This will go splat if/when the arch chooses to not implement per-cpu
storage for not-possible CPUs. Use for_each_possible_cpu().
> +
> +static const ktime_t nsec_per_hz = { .tv64 = NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ };
> +
This could use the same trick as KTIME_HIGH_RES and friends. But perhaps
the compiler will generate the same code..
> +/*
> + * We switched off the global tick source when switching to high resolution
> + * mode. Update jiffies64.
> + *
> + * Must be called with interrupts disabled !
> + *
> + * FIXME: We need a mechanism to assign the update to a CPU. In principle this
> + * is not hard, but when dynamic ticks come into play it starts to be. We don't
> + * want to wake up a complete idle cpu just to update jiffies, so we need
> + * something more intellegent than a mere "do this only on CPUx".
> + */
> +static void update_jiffies64(ktime_t now)
> +{
> + ktime_t delta;
> +
> + write_seqlock(&xtime_lock);
> +
> + delta = ktime_sub(now, last_jiffies_update);
> + if (delta.tv64 >= nsec_per_hz.tv64) {
> +
stray blank line.
> + unsigned long orun = 1;
"orun"?
> +
> + delta = ktime_sub(delta, nsec_per_hz);
> + last_jiffies_update = ktime_add(last_jiffies_update,
> + nsec_per_hz);
> +
> + /* Slow path for long timeouts */
> + if (unlikely(delta.tv64 >= nsec_per_hz.tv64)) {
> + s64 incr = ktime_to_ns(nsec_per_hz);
> + orun = ktime_divns(delta, incr);
> +
> + last_jiffies_update = ktime_add_ns(last_jiffies_update,
> + incr * orun);
> + jiffies_64 += orun;
> + orun++;
> + }
That's a bit of a hack isn't it? do_timer() owns the modification of
jiffies_64, so why is this code modifying it as well?
> + do_timer(orun);
twice?
I suspect a bug.
> + }
> + write_sequnlock(&xtime_lock);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * We rearm the timer until we get disabled by the idle code
> + */
> +static int hrtimer_sched_tick(struct hrtimer *timer)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base =
> + container_of(timer, struct hrtimer_cpu_base, sched_timer);
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + /*
> + * Do not call, when we are not in irq context and have
> + * no valid regs pointer
> + */
> + if (cpu_base->sched_regs) {
> + update_process_times(user_mode(cpu_base->sched_regs));
> + profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING, cpu_base->sched_regs);
> + }
> +
> + hrtimer_forward(timer, hrtimer_cb_get_time(timer), nsec_per_hz);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +
> + return HRTIMER_RESTART;
bah. hrtimer_restart is an `enum hrtimer_restart', not an integer.
> + printk(KERN_INFO "hrtimers: Switched to high resolution mode CPU %d\n",
> + smp_processor_id());
"on CPU"
> +
> +static inline int hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram(struct hrtimer *timer,
> + struct hrtimer_clock_base *base)
> +{
> + /*
> + * When High resolution timers are active try to reprogram. Note, that
> + * in case the state has HRTIMER_CALLBACK set, no reprogramming and no
> + * expiry check happens. The timer gets enqueued into the rbtree and
> + * the reprogramming / expiry check is done in the hrtimer_interrupt or
> + * in the softirq.
> + */
This (useful) comment should be above the function, not inside it.
> + if (hrtimer_hres_active && hrtimer_reprogram(timer, base)) {
> +
> + /* Timer is expired, act upon the callback mode */
> + switch(timer->cb_mode) {
> + case HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_NO_RESTART:
> + /*
> + * We can call the callback from here. No restart
> + * happens, so no danger of recursion
> + */
> + BUG_ON(timer->function(timer) != HRTIMER_NORESTART);
Doing assert(thing-which-has-side-effects) is poor form.
I doubt if the kernel will work if someone goes and disables BUG_ON, but
it's a laudable objective.
> + return 1;
> + case HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_NO_SOFTIRQ:
> + /*
> + * This is solely for the sched tick emulation with
> + * dynamic tick support to ensure that we do not
> + * restart the tick right on the edge and end up with
> + * the tick timer in the softirq ! The calling site
> + * takes care of this.
> + */
> + return 1;
> + case HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE:
> + case HRTIMER_CB_SOFTIRQ:
> + /*
> + * Move everything else into the softirq pending list !
> + */
> + hrtimer_add_cb_pending(timer, base);
> + raise_softirq(HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ);
> + return 1;
> + default:
> + BUG();
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void hrtimer_resume_jiffie_update(void)
hrtimer_resume_jiffy_update
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + ktime_t now = ktime_get();
> +
> + write_seqlock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags);
> + last_jiffies_update = now;
> + write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +# define hrtimer_hres_active 0
> +# define hrtimer_check_clocks() do { } while (0)
> +# define hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram(t,b) 0
> +# define hrtimer_force_reprogram(b) do { } while (0)
> +# define hrtimer_cb_pending(t) 0
> +# define hrtimer_remove_cb_pending(t) do { } while (0)
> +# define hrtimer_init_hres(c) do { } while (0)
> +# define hrtimer_init_timer_hres(t) do { } while (0)
> +# define hrtimer_resume_jiffie_update() do { } while (0)
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS */
> +
> /*
> * Timekeeping resumed notification
resume
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
> +
> +/*
> + * High resolution timer interrupt
> + * Called with interrupts disabled
> + */
> +void hrtimer_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + struct hrtimer_clock_base *base;
> + ktime_t expires_next, now;
> + int i, raise = 0, cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base = &per_cpu(hrtimer_bases, cpu);
> +
> + BUG_ON(!cpu_base->hres_active);
> +
> + /* Store the regs for an possible sched_timer callback */
> + cpu_base->sched_regs = regs;
> + cpu_base->events++;
> +
> + retry:
> + now = ktime_get();
> +
> + /* Check, if the jiffies need an update */
> + update_jiffies64(now);
> +
> + expires_next.tv64 = KTIME_MAX;
> +
> + base = cpu_base->clock_base;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES; i++) {
> + ktime_t basenow;
> + struct rb_node *node;
> +
> + spin_lock(&cpu_base->lock);
> +
> + basenow = ktime_add(now, base->offset);
Would it be better to take the lock outside the loop, rather than hammering
on it like this?
> + while ((node = base->first)) {
> + struct hrtimer *timer;
> +
> + timer = rb_entry(node, struct hrtimer, node);
> +
> + if (basenow.tv64 < timer->expires.tv64) {
> + ktime_t expires;
> +
> + expires = ktime_sub(timer->expires,
> + base->offset);
> + if (expires.tv64 < expires_next.tv64)
> + expires_next = expires;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* Move softirq callbacks to the pending list */
> + if (timer->cb_mode == HRTIMER_CB_SOFTIRQ) {
> + __remove_hrtimer(timer, base, HRTIMER_PENDING, 0);
> + hrtimer_add_cb_pending(timer, base);
> + raise = 1;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + __remove_hrtimer(timer, base, HRTIMER_CALLBACK, 0);
> +
> + if (timer->function(timer) != HRTIMER_NORESTART) {
> + BUG_ON(timer->state != HRTIMER_CALLBACK);
> + /*
> + * state == HRTIMER_CALLBACK prevents
> + * reprogramming. We do this when we break out
> + * of the loop !
> + */
> + enqueue_hrtimer(timer, base);
> + }
> + timer->state &= ~HRTIMER_CALLBACK;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&cpu_base->lock);
> + base++;
> + }
> +
> + cpu_base->expires_next = expires_next;
> +
> + /* Reprogramming necessary ? */
> + if (expires_next.tv64 != KTIME_MAX) {
> + if (clockevents_set_next_event(expires_next, 0))
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> + /* Invalidate regs */
> + cpu_base->sched_regs = NULL;
> +
> + /* Raise softirq ? */
> + if (raise)
> + raise_softirq(HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ);
> +}
> +
>
> ...
>
> static int __sched do_nanosleep(struct hrtimer_sleeper *t, enum hrtimer_mode mode)
> @@ -701,7 +1226,8 @@ static int __sched do_nanosleep(struct h
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> hrtimer_start(&t->timer, t->timer.expires, mode);
>
> - schedule();
> + if (likely(t->task))
> + schedule();
Why? Needs a comment.
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +#
> +# Timer subsystem related configuration options
> +#
> +config HIGH_RES_TIMERS
> + bool "High Resolution Timer Support"
> + depends on GENERIC_TIME
> + help
> + This option enables high resolution timer support. If your
> + hardware is not capable then this option only increases
> + the size of the kernel image.
> +
> +config HIGH_RES_RESOLUTION
> + int "High Resolution Timer resolution (nanoseconds)"
> + depends on HIGH_RES_TIMERS
> + default 1000
> + help
> + This sets the resolution in nanoseconds of the high resolution
> + timers. Too fine a resolution (small a number) will usually
> + not be observable due to normal system latencies. For an
> + 800 MHz processor about 10,000 (10 microseconds) is recommended as a
> + finest resolution. If you don't need that sort of resolution,
> + larger values may generate less overhead.
In that case the default is far too low.
What value are you suggesting that users and vendors set it to?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists