[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060930093421.GP22787@rhun.haifa.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:34:21 +0300
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Jim Paradis <jparadis@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jdmason@...zu.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86[-64] PCI domain support
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:31:16AM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:03:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > hmmmm. What kernels did you test?
>
> mainline as of today + several unrelated Calgary patches I'll post
> shortly + your PCI domains patch + my Calgary patch. I'll test with
> iommu=off next.
>
> > That should narrow down the problems. A problem with aic94xx sorta
> > sounds like something unrelated.
>
> Not necessarily - Calgary is an isolating IOMMU, meaning that if we
> set up a mapping for aic94xx in the wrong IO space due to a Calgary
> bug, aic94xx will fall over and die. Usually however this happens a
> lot sooner. Also, we have code in Calgary to detect when an errant DMA
> happens and it hasn't triggered in this case.
Ok, turns out it's neither a PCI domains nor Calgary issue, since I
can reproduce it on mainline with iommu=off. Must be an aic94xx
issue, I'll send the details to linux-scsi in a bit.
Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists