[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609302158.03692.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:58:02 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/3] swsusp: Add ioctl for swap files support
On Saturday, 30 September 2006 16:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Am Friday 29 September 2006 01:35 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > @@ -119,7 +119,18 @@ extern int snapshot_image_loaded(struct
> > #define SNAPSHOT_SET_SWAP_FILE _IOW(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 10,
> > unsigned int) #define
> > SNAPSHOT_S2RAM _IO(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 11) #define
> > SNAPSHOT_PMOPS _IOW(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 12, unsigned int)
> > -#define SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAXNR 12
> > +#define SNAPSHOT_SET_SWAP_AREA _IOW(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 13, void *)
> > +#define SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAXNR 13
>
> Your definition looks wrong, '_IOW(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 13, void *)' means
> your ioctl passes a pointer to a 'void *'.
>
> You probably mean
>
> #define SNAPSHOT_SET_SWAP_AREA _IOW(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 13, \
> struct resume_swap_area)
No. I mean the ioctl passes a pointer, the size of which is sizeof(void *).
Greetings,
Rafael
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists