[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <653402b90609301310l54abf3a3y82f4f3e20d9f1394@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:10:24 +0000
From: "Miguel Ojeda" <maxextreme@...il.com>
To: "Miguel Ojeda Sandonis" <maxextreme@...il.com>, akpm@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18 V6] drivers: add lcd display support
On 9/30/06, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de> wrote:
>
> AFAIK, the 'D' in LCD is already an abbreviation for "display", so
> could we name it lcdisplay or something like that?
>
My first guess was "lcd" ("d" as display), but there were already
devices with such name. So I chose "display", as they are additional
small displays (LCD or not). However, people thought it was a very
common name. Then I chose "LCD Display". Such name is more expressive
(it is "a Display, LCD type") and doesn't makes trouble with new lcd
screens, or the "lcd" drivers, or...
I don't care really about the name with or without "double d". Can
someone else give his/her opinion about this?
Thank you,
Miguel Ojeda
> MfG, JBG
>
> --
> Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@...-owl.de +49-172-7608481
> Signature of: The real problem with C++ for kernel modules is: the language just sucks.
> the second : -- Linus Torvalds
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFFHmWAHb1edYOZ4bsRAkdpAJ4g9+GPFYU4Y5W7JdGZXFDCmBDIggCfe6dk
> 3FbG+mcZQ+10MNkq5wC9J7w=
> =KzkJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists