linux-kernel - Re: [OOPS] -git8,9: NULL pointer dereference in mptspi_dv_renegotiate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:55:44 -0700
From:	Bryce Harrington <bryce@...l.org>
To:	"Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@...l.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OOPS] -git8,9:  NULL pointer dereference in mptspi_dv_renegotiate_work

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:22:50PM -0600, Moore, Eric wrote:
> On Fri 9/29/2006 6:27 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> 
> > Does this look better?
> >
> >    http://crucible.osdl.org/runs/2265/sysinfo/amd01.3.console
> 
> 
> It appears that the problem is we're not receiving interrupts.
> The first command after interrupts enabled is not getting a response
> back from firmware, thus timing out.   I noticed in the log its
> saying interrupt is at 185, but apparently the INT line is not getting
> raised.  
> 
> In addition, I understand why the panic.  You've compiled the drivers
> into the kernel, instead of module.  i.e. if you compiled as module, 
> mptspi wouldn't been called while mptbase is loaded, as in your case.
> I guess we would need to add sanity check for that case. I'm usually
> testing as modules.

Ah, that could explain it; when doing testing we do compile everything
in.  So it sounds like we could eliminate the panic by compiling as a
module, however is it intended that the driver should work when compiled
in as well?  If so, I'd be happy to do additional testing to verify any
fixes worth trying out.

> Besides, we need to undertand why your interrupt controller is not
> generating interrupts.

We typically boot every -mm, -git, -rc and mainline kernel on this
machine, but it's only been relatively recently that this particular
behavior has occurred.  Could this suggest that there was a regression
due to recent changes?

Thanks,
Bryce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/