| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:17:39 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com> To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> Subject: Re: appletouch vs. usbhid Hi Pete, On Saturday 30 September 2006 17:20, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Dear Dmitry: > > A user filed a bug here which seems to indicate that hid lacks needed > exclusions for Apple pointers: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208721 > Do you think we should be adding QUIRK_IGNORE for these? Yes, I think we should. > Perhaps conditional on CONFIG_USB_APPLETOUCH? No, I think we should just do that unconditionally and have users select appletouch driver. > > We used to have those IGNORE quirks for Wacom, but then started to ignore > all Wacoms. We seem to be not at that point with Apple yet, and also they > have varying vendor IDs. > Ping Cheng swore that Wacom never produced HID-compiant device and that it would be easier for her if we blacklisted Wacom as vendor in HID... -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists