[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061001110128.bb98fd96.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:01:28 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kauditd thread API fixes
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 08:30:45 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
>
> Kill the "function should return a value" warning, and use the standard
> mechanism for deciding when a thread should stop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
>
> ---
>
> Given the security-sensitive nature of the audit function, _perhaps_ the
> omission of kthread_should_stop() was intentional. If so, it at least
> deserves a comment. But I think this is more correct.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index f9889ee..b9146b1 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int kauditd_thread(void *dummy)
> {
> struct sk_buff *skb;
>
> - while (1) {
> + do {
> skb = skb_dequeue(&audit_skb_queue);
> wake_up(&audit_backlog_wait);
> if (skb) {
> @@ -368,7 +368,9 @@ static int kauditd_thread(void *dummy)
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> remove_wait_queue(&kauditd_wait, &wait);
> }
> - }
> + } while (!kthread_should_stop());
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int audit_send_list(void *_dest)
I've had a basically-identical patch in -mm for a few months. Sent to viro once
or twice, nothing happened, gave up. I'll re-add it to the
maintainer-spamming-list.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists