[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061001115241.fb9dc96d.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:52:41 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, torvalds@...l.org,
rossb@...gle.com, akpm@...gle.com, sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [patch 024/144] allow /proc/config.gz to be built as a module
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:36:00 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 09:39:54 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:27:25 -0700 akpm@...l.org wrote:
> >
> > > From: Ross Biro <rossb@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > The driver for /proc/config.gz consumes rather a lot of memory and it is in
> > > fact possible to build it as a module.
> > >
> > > In some ways this is a bit risky, because the .config which is used for
> > > compiling kernel/configs.c isn't necessarily the same as the .config which was
> > > used to build vmlinux.
> > >
> > > But OTOH the potential memory savings are decent, and it'd be fairly dumb to
> > > build your configs.o with a different .config.
> >
> > so after getting several disagreements on this, you are going ahead
> > with it.
>
> Actually I had this mentally tagged as "needs more arguing before merging"
> but then forgot and went and sent it anyway.
Well, we agree on that part at least.
> So now it's in the "needs more arguing before we revert it" category.
Wrong order IMO.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists