linux-kernel - Re: Announce: gcc bogus warning repository

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061001190034.GB29920@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 1 Oct 2006 20:00:34 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Announce: gcc bogus warning repository

On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 11:58:33AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 14:45 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> > That doesn't address my question at all.
> 
> Did you have a question?
> 
> > If there is no difference between real non-init bugs and bogus warnings, 
> > then a config option doesn't make any difference at all, does it?  Real 
> > bugs are still hidden either way:  if the warnings are turned on, the 
> > bugs are lost in the noise.  if the warnings are turned off, the bugs 
> > are completely hidden.
> 
> If you turn the warnings on, at least you have a chance to see a warning
> even if it's mixed with others.

And that's better than the current situation in which respects, exactly?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/