[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <452014C2.1050000@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:19:30 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"Linux-Kernel," <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"J.A. Magall??n" <jamagallon@....com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2)
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> well... why not go one step further and eliminate the flags argument
> entirely? And use pci_name() for the name (so eliminate the argument ;)
> and always pass pdev as data, so that that argument can go away too....
>
> that'll cover 99% of the request_irq() users for pci devices.. and makes
> it really nicely simple and consistent.
Disagree. That would involve rewriting a lot of drivers.
flags: may or may not need sample-random flag.
name: is always the ethernet interface, for net drivers, or did you
forget from your irqbalance days? ;-)
data: in practice, is _rarely_ struct pci_dev. It's usually a
driver-private structure which is the structure most frequently
accessed. struct pci_dev* is rarely accessed inside the interrupt
handler, except maybe somewhere deep in an error handling path.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists