| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1159730750.24767.27.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:25:50 -0700 From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Announce: gcc bogus warning repository On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:20 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:13:54PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:07 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:03:10PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > > And that's better than the current situation in which respects, exactly? > > > > > > > > Seeing the warnings is the current situation. > > > > > > I bow to your incredible power of observation. Now that you've shared > > > that revelation with the list, could you explain what does blanket silencing > > > of these warnings buy you, oh wan^H^Hise one? > > > > Did you see me silencing anything (with your crystal ball?) ? Cause I'm > > not. > > And what, in your opinion, does the patch in question achieve if not > that? You mean the patch from Steven posted in May? Well it does appear to silence the warning. You didn't like the approach it seems? Please tell me why . Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists