[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1159675508.5453.3.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 00:05:07 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: "Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-Kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Postal 56% waits for flock_lock_file_wait
On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 21:26 +0400, Ananiev, Leonid I wrote:
> > On which filesystem were the above results obtained if it was not
> ext2?
> The default ext3 fs was used.
>
> > All the above results are telling you is that your test involves
> several
> > processes contending for the same lock, and so all of them barring the
> > one process that actually holds the lock are idle.
>
> Yes. It is flock_lock_file_wait.
That is the function which causes the sleep, yes. So what is your gripe?
The kernel would appear to be doing exactly what is expected of it.
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists