[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0610020848070.28876@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <dlang@...italinsight.com>
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>
cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Drew Scott Daniels <ddaniels@...lumni.mb.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Phillip Susi wrote:
> David Lang wrote:
>> I just had what's probably a silly thought.
>>
>> as an alturnative to useing tar, what about useing a git pack?
>>
>> create a git archive with no history, just the current files, and then pack
>> it with agressive delta options.
>>
>
> Isn't that what a patch.gz is? Diff generates the deltas and then they are
> compressed. Can't get much simpler or better than that.
not quite, a git pack includes everythign you need to get the full source, a
patch.gz requires that you have the prior version of the source to start with.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists