[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061002023720.9780.85391.sendpatchset@v0>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:37:20 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: [PATCH] usb hubc build fix.patch prefix
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
The patch series 2.6.18-mm2-broken-out does not apply to 2.6.18,
for me anyway.
The 'quilt push' of this series fails with:
Applying patch usb-hubc-build-fix.patch
patching file drivers/usb/core/hub.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1831.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1904 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1946.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file drivers/usb/core/hub.c
Patch usb-hubc-build-fix.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
If I apply the following patch *just before* the failing
usb-hubc-build-fix.patch, everything applies cleanly from there on
down the patch set.
I don't know what's right here. I'm just blindly pushing code.
But it seems obvious to me that the 2.6.18-mm2 broken-out patch set
is borked:
The first patch in the series: origin.patch, definitely places these
two hub_* defines just before the usb_resume_root_hub() routine.
But then the patch usb-hubc-build-fix.patch clearly expects to find
those two hub_* defines just before the hub_suspend() routine.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
---
drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- 2.6.18-mm2.orig/drivers/usb/core/hub.c 2006-10-01 17:52:53.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.18-mm2/drivers/usb/core/hub.c 2006-10-01 18:26:17.000000000 -0700
@@ -1862,6 +1862,8 @@ static inline int remote_wakeup(struct u
return 0;
}
+#define hub_suspend NULL
+#define hub_resume NULL
#endif
static int hub_suspend(struct usb_interface *intf, pm_message_t msg)
@@ -1946,8 +1948,6 @@ static inline int remote_wakeup(struct u
return 0;
}
-#define hub_suspend NULL
-#define hub_resume NULL
#endif
void usb_resume_root_hub(struct usb_device *hdev)
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists